What do you think of this 'judicial' reasoning?

From: Ray Marshall [raymarsh@mninter.net]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 8:06 AM
To: Jake Manahan
Subject: What do you think of this 'judicial' reasoning?

-->

I posted this on a Catholic blog which was discussing polygamy as the next step after homosexual marriage. A bit of hyperbole perhaps, but something that is not being discussed and should be.

And right after polygamy is endorsed, the bestiality crowd will move into line to get theirs. But they will be fighting NAMBLA who will plead seniority.

Don't laugh. In the light of what we know now about our society, how would it be possible to say "no" to them?

These would have to be considered as falling within the shelter of the "right of privacy" just as abortion and birth control were classified.

By the way, drag out your copy of the Constitution of the United States. In it you will see that in Article III, concerning the courts, Section 2 reads as follows: "Clause 1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority...."

Article VI reads in part: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."

The astute reader will note that "treaties" are part of the "supreme law of the land" according to the Constitution.

That means that UN laws and regulations and those of NATO and other organization which the US is a member of, will become laws that have to be observed in the United States.

Several of the sitting Supreme Court justices are regularly citing European rights and legislation in their opinions.

It's only a matter of time until the "Euro-justices" on the U.S. bench will have a majority.